Falk v. 569 Broadway Associates

200 A.D.2d 535, 607 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 660
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 27, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William Davis, J.), entered May 28, 1993, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We need not determine whether plaintiff effectively exercised his option since even if he did he would not have automatically become a limited partner. Having made no contribution of capital, plaintiff did not become a partner, and his action for an accounting was therefore properly dismissed (see, Winter v Beale, Lynch & Co., 198 AD2d 124). We have considered plaintiff’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ross, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Falk v. 569 Broadway Associates, 200 A.D.2d 535, 607 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

200 A.D.2d 535 (Falk v. 569 Broadway Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomson v. Walsh & Hacker
216 A.D.3d 1337 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Kaur v. Royal Arcadia Palace, Inc.
643 F. Supp. 2d 276 (E.D. New York, 2007)