Falgout v. Trujillo

Tenth Circuit

Falgout v. Trujillo

380 F.2d 376

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedJuly 5, 1967

DocketNo. 9288

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 380 F.2d 376 (Falgout v. Trujillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Falgout v. Trujillo, 380 F.2d 376 (10th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, confined as a prisoner of the State of Colorado, filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, raising the question of violation of his Constitutional rights. An able attorney was appointed to represent him there, an evidentiary hearing was had before Chief Judge Arraj and in a memorandum opinion the writ was denied. We have carefully reviewed the entire record and the denial is affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons stated in, the opinion of the trial judge, reported in 270 F.Supp. 685, D.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, confined as a prisoner of the State of Colorado, filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, raising the question of violation of his Constitutional rights. An able attorney was appointed to represent him there, an evidentiary hearing was had before Chief Judge Arraj and in a memorandum opinion the writ was denied. We have carefully reviewed the entire record and the denial is affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons stated in, the opinion of the trial judge, reported in 270 F.Supp. 685, D.C.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

380 F.2d 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falgout-v-trujillo-ca10-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack