Faletti v. Child

Appellate Court of Illinois

Faletti v. Child

204 Ill. App. 158

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided February 10, 1917·No. Gen. No. 6,396·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Assumpsit, action of, § 92*—when instruction is misleading. An instruction that a $600 item in a hill of particulars was based upon a certain check for that amount in evidence, held misleading , in an action to recover for money loaned in which such bill of par- ¡ ticulars was filed, as in order to sustain that item it would be necessary not merely to show the check but also that it was an advancement or loan to the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Assumpsit, action of, § 92*—when instruction is misleading. An instruction that a $600 item in a hill of particulars was based upon a certain check for that amount in evidence, held misleading , in an action to recover for money loaned in which such bill of par- ¡ ticulars was filed, as in order to sustain that item it would be necessary not merely to show the check but also that it was an advancement or loan to the defendant.

Faletti v. Child, 204 Ill. App. 158 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

204 Ill. App. 158 (Faletti v. Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related