Falconer v. Ricker Realty Co.

176 A. 165, 117 N.J. Eq. 452, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 668
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 10, 1935·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, dismissing the bill of complaint which sought an injunction to prevent the defendants-respondents from obstructing the natural flow of the waters of a stream at a point above lands of complainant-appellant. The vice-chancellor held that the proofs adduced by the appellant failed to sustain the cause of action set out in the hill of complaint.

A careful consideration of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that the court below was correct in the finding on the facts, and the decree should be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Dohges, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — -None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Falconer v. Ricker Realty Co., 176 A. 165, 117 N.J. Eq. 452, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 668 (N.J. 1935).

176 A. 165 (Falconer v. Ricker Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.