Falconer v. Ricker Realty Co.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, dismissing the bill of complaint which sought an injunction to prevent the defendants-respondents from obstructing the natural flow of the waters of a stream at a point above lands of complainant-appellant. The vice-chancellor held that the proofs adduced by the appellant failed to sustain the cause of action set out in the hill of complaint.
A careful consideration of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that the court below was correct in the finding on the facts, and the decree should be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Dohges, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, JJ. 13.
For reversal — -None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
176 A. 165 (Falconer v. Ricker Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.