Falconer v. Regelier ex rel. Workman

6 Md. 552
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 15, 1854·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Tuck, J.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

This appears to be a proceeding under the act of 1831, eh. 315, sec. 5, to compel a guardian to bring money into court to be invested.

We have decided, in the appeal of Shipley, 4 Md. Rep., 496, that the decision of such questions is submitted to the discretion of the orphans courts, and that an appeal will not lie from their action on such applications.

Jlppeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Falconer v. Regelier ex rel. Workman, 6 Md. 552 (Md. 1854).

6 Md. 552 (Falconer v. Regelier ex rel. Workman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melville v. Page
170 A. 175 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1934)