Falcone v. Falcone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Falcone v. Falcone

25 A.D.2d 602, 269 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4924

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 602 (Falcone v. Falcone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Falcone v. Falcone, 25 A.D.2d 602, 269 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts, and a new trial granted, without costs of this appeal to eithor party. Memorandum: Heretofore we reserved decision upon this appeal and remitted the action to the Referee for the making of appropriate findings of faet and conclusions of law (24 A D 2d 50). While we reviewed the facts in some detail it was emphasized (p. 54) that “this evidence presented questions of credibility which the trier of the facts, and not this court, must resolve.” The Referee has submitted an “ opinion ” but no findings of fact were made. In lieu thereof certain conclusory statements are made from which it appears that the Referee continues to misunderstand the issues presented. Thus, it is concluded that “ no fraud or deception was practiced on plaintiff-husband ” by the defendant. This has little or no relevancy. Our prior opinion (24 A D 2d 50) pointed out that the issue was whether or not constructive trusts should -be impressed on certain realty by reason of defendant’s oral promise to reconvey and the existing confidential relation which would be abused if there were repudiation, without redress, of a trust orally declared. The failure of the Referee to comply with the prior order of this court and his apparent failure to understand the issues presented mandate a new. trial. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara Trial Term, adjudging that defendant assign and deliver to plaintiff certain deeds.)

Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Veechio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts, and a new trial granted, without costs of this appeal to eithor party. Memorandum: Heretofore we reserved decision upon this appeal and remitted the action to the Referee for the making of appropriate findings of faet and conclusions of law (24 A D 2d 50). While we reviewed the facts in some detail it was emphasized (p. 54) that “this evidence presented questions of credibility which the trier of the facts, and not this court, must resolve.” The Referee has submitted an “ opinion ” but no findings of fact were made. In lieu thereof certain conclusory statements are made from which it appears that the Referee continues to misunderstand the issues presented. Thus, it is concluded that “ no fraud or deception was practiced on plaintiff-husband ” by the defendant. This has little or no relevancy. Our prior opinion (24 A D 2d 50) pointed out that the issue was whether or not constructive trusts should -be impressed on certain realty by reason of defendant’s oral promise to reconvey and the existing confidential relation which would be abused if there were repudiation, without redress, of a trust orally declared. The failure of the Referee to comply with the prior order of this court and his apparent failure to understand the issues presented mandate a new. trial. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara Trial Term, adjudging that defendant assign and deliver to plaintiff certain deeds.)

Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Veechio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 602, 269 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falcone-v-falcone-nyappdiv-1966.