Falco v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

161 A.D. 889, 145 N.Y.S. 1122
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Falco v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 161 A.D. 735

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to defendant, and ffiotion denied upon the ground that the affidavit upon which the order is based states no fact whatever justifying the inference that defendant has in its possession any information that the decedent was killed by any detached or flying fragment from defendant’s train or that defendant actually or inferentially has the same in its possession, or that any reports have been made to it with reference to such parts. Without otherwise passing on the merits of the motion, leave is given to renew upon affidavits which shall suitably inform the court as to the nature and cause of the accident. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Falco v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 161 A.D. 889, 145 N.Y.S. 1122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

161 A.D. 889 (Falco v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.