Falco Construction Corp. v. Christopher Boomis Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Falco Construction Corp. v. Christopher Boomis Associates

54 A.D.2d 970, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14901

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 970 (Falco Construction Corp. v. Christopher Boomis Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Falco Construction Corp. v. Christopher Boomis Associates, 54 A.D.2d 970, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

an action inter alia on a contract, plaintiff Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 19, 1976, as (1) denied its motion for partial summary judgment, (2) granted the cross motion of defendant Dyer for leave to serve an amended answer and (3) set the action down for trial on a date certain. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. It was conceded on the submission of this appeal that the issues in this case have proceeded to trial but remain undecided and a verdict is presently pending. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Titone and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

an action inter alia on a contract, plaintiff Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 19, 1976, as (1) denied its motion for partial summary judgment, (2) granted the cross motion of defendant Dyer for leave to serve an amended answer and (3) set the action down for trial on a date certain. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. It was conceded on the submission of this appeal that the issues in this case have proceeded to trial but remain undecided and a verdict is presently pending. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Titone and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 970, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falco-construction-corp-v-christopher-boomis-associates-nyappdiv-1976.