Falanga v. Consolidated Foods Corp.
Opinion
In this action of tort for personal injuries caused by the defendant’s negligence there was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted “to that portion of the charge in which the Court made reference to a suggestion that pain and suffering might be worth a dollar an hour.” Detailed quotation from the charge would not be profitable. There are two answers to the defendant’s contention. (1) The wording of the exception is not a fair construction of the judge's language. (2) Additional instructions, which were not the subject of exception, completely disposed of any conceivable erroneous interpretation.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
249 N.E.2d 630 (Falanga v. Consolidated Foods Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.