Falagan v. State

245 So. 2d 915, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6967
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Falagan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6114
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 1971·No. No. 70-582·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his conviction of robbery. We have carefully reviewed the record and find that there was sufficient evidence to sustain a verdict of guilty. Appellant raises as error, for the first time on appeal, that he was prejudiced in the preparation of his defense since he was without assistance of counsel when he was identified in an allegedly improper police lineup prior to trial. The record on appeal does not disclose that there was any lineup held prior to trial and therefore, this court is precluded from considering this issue. However, appellant may seek proper consideration of this contention by perfecting those motions which may be directed to the trial court.

Affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Falagan v. State, 245 So. 2d 915, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6967 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

245 So. 2d 915 (Falagan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.