Fakic v. Sonchik

Ninth Circuit

Fakic v. Sonchik

35 F. App'x 674

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 28, 2002

DocketNo. 01-15607; D.C. No. CV-00-00083-KJD (RJJ)

StatusPublished

This text of 35 F. App'x 674 (Fakic v. Sonchik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fakic v. Sonchik, 35 F. App'x 674 (9th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Edin Fakic, a native and citizen of Bosnia, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment denying Fakie’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Baeta v. Sonchik, 273 F.3d 1261, 1263 (9th Cir. 2001). We dismiss Fakie’s petition as moot.

Fakie’s claims were based on an order that is no longer in effect, which has been [675]*675superseded by an order deferring removal to Bosnia and Croatia. Further, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) has released Fakic from custody. Consequently, Fakic’s contentions that the INS should issue a final administrative order, release him from detention, and refrain from removing him to Croatia are moot. See Picrin-Peron v. Rison, 930 F.2d 773, 775 (9th Cir.1991).

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM

**

Edin Fakic, a native and citizen of Bosnia, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment denying Fakie’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Baeta v. Sonchik, 273 F.3d 1261, 1263 (9th Cir. 2001). We dismiss Fakie’s petition as moot.

Fakie’s claims were based on an order that is no longer in effect, which has been [675]*675superseded by an order deferring removal to Bosnia and Croatia. Further, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) has released Fakic from custody. Consequently, Fakic’s contentions that the INS should issue a final administrative order, release him from detention, and refrain from removing him to Croatia are moot. See Picrin-Peron v. Rison, 930 F.2d 773, 775 (9th Cir.1991).

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 F. App'x 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fakic-v-sonchik-ca9-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack