Fake v. Warden
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7359
TINA M. FAKE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (2:09-cv-00141-REM-DJJ)
Submitted: December 21, 2010 Decided: January 4, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tina M. Fake, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tina M. Fake appeals the district court’s order
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing
her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) habeas petition.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Fake’s
informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Fake has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. Further, we deny Fake’s motion for a certificate of
appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fake v. Warden (Fake v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.