Fajardo v. City of Bakersfield

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 6, 2022·No. 1:16-cv-00699·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 | GILBERTO FAJARDO, Case No. 1:16-cv-00699-DAD-BAK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER RE: STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION 14 | CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., (ECF No. 90) 15 Defendants. 16 17 The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 18 | 90.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 | 41€aC)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the 20 Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 33 Dated: _ June 6, 2022 [sl ey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fajardo v. City of Bakersfield, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Fajardo v. City of Bakersfield (Fajardo v. City of Bakersfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)