Fajans v. R. H. Macy & Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Fajans v. R. H. Macy & Co.

165 Misc. 100, 300 N.Y.S. 624, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1967

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 165 Misc. 100 (Fajans v. R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fajans v. R. H. Macy & Co., 165 Misc. 100, 300 N.Y.S. 624, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the statute (Labor Law, § 390) does not forbid all compulsory contributions to benefit or insurance funds but only those where the fund is maintained or managed for the employees by someone other than themselves. The complaint does not show that this is done in the present case. It does not show that the fund is maintained or managed by the defendant or by any other corporation or unincorporated association or by any person or persons other than the employees themselves.

Order denying motion to dismiss complaint reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff on payment of said costs to serve an amended complaint within six days after service of order entered hereon.

Order striking out defense reversed, and motion denied on the ground that the complaint is itself insufficient.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the statute (Labor Law, § 390) does not forbid all compulsory contributions to benefit or insurance funds but only those where the fund is maintained or managed for the employees by someone other than themselves. The complaint does not show that this is done in the present case. It does not show that the fund is maintained or managed by the defendant or by any other corporation or unincorporated association or by any person or persons other than the employees themselves.

Order denying motion to dismiss complaint reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff on payment of said costs to serve an amended complaint within six days after service of order entered hereon.

Order striking out defense reversed, and motion denied on the ground that the complaint is itself insufficient.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 Misc. 100, 300 N.Y.S. 624, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fajans-v-r-h-macy-co-nyappterm-1937.