Fajack v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.

73 F. Supp. 308, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2293
District Court, N.D. Ohio·Decided July 23, 1947·No. Civil Action No. 24490·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

JONES, District Judge.

The basis for the liability sought to be imposed in this case as laid does not conform to the requirements of the so-called Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, approved May 14, 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 251 et seq. The complaint, therefore, will be dismissed without prejudice.

If the plaintiffs are able to bring an action alleging essential facts respecting unpaid overtime and for valid compensable time as is required by the new Act, the opportunity is not foreclosed.

If, as is suggested, the constitutionality of the statute is to be put in issue it would be far better to have such challenge incorporated in a new complaint.

Amendment or supplement to the complaint was suggested but complications in pleading are apprehended in an attempt to re-form pleadings in pending actions, particularly where a new statute imposing conditions has intervened.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fajack v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co., 73 F. Supp. 308, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2293 (N.D. Ohio 1947).

73 F. Supp. 308 (Fajack v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co.
168 F.2d 58 (Fourth Circuit, 1948)
Smith v. Cleveland Pneumatic Tool Co.
8 F.R.D. 263 (N.D. Ohio, 1948)
Parkhill v. Todd Shipyards Corp.
190 Misc. 782 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co.
76 F. Supp. 575 (D. Minnesota, 1947)
Alameda v. Paraffine Companies
75 F. Supp. 282 (N.D. California, 1947)
Ackerman v. J. I. Case Co.
74 F. Supp. 639 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1947)
Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co.
74 F. Supp. 412 (D. Maryland, 1947)
Johnson v. Park City Consol. Mines Co.
73 F. Supp. 852 (E.D. Missouri, 1947)
Bartels v. Sperti, Inc.
73 F. Supp. 751 (S.D. New York, 1947)