Faivre v. Union Dime Savings Institution

The Superior Court of New York City

Faivre v. Union Dime Savings Institution

27 Jones & S. 558, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 79

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedJanuary 5, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Jones & S. 558 (Faivre v. Union Dime Savings Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faivre v. Union Dime Savings Institution, 27 Jones & S. 558, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 79 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court (per Curiam) in modifying the order and [560]*560affirming it as modified, wrote as follows: The orders, when modified as hereinafter directed, may be sustained under the General Banking Act of the State of New York, Laws 1882, Chap. 409 (See Chap. 10 of said Act). The provision directing the Union Dime Savings- Insti-. tution to open a new account as a deposit to the credit of this action under its usual by-laws and regulations, etc., should be stricken out, and in place thereof the said Savings Institution sho.uld be required to deposit the fund in court according to the usual practice in such cases. As thus modified the orders- should be affirmed without costs to either party on this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court (per Curiam) in modifying the order and [560]*560affirming it as modified, wrote as follows: The orders, when modified as hereinafter directed, may be sustained under the General Banking Act of the State of New York, Laws 1882, Chap. 409 (See Chap. 10 of said Act). The provision directing the Union Dime Savings- Insti-. tution to open a new account as a deposit to the credit of this action under its usual by-laws and regulations, etc., should be stricken out, and in place thereof the said Savings Institution sho.uld be required to deposit the fund in court according to the usual practice in such cases. As thus modified the orders- should be affirmed without costs to either party on this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Jones & S. 558, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faivre-v-union-dime-savings-institution-nysuperctnyc-1891.