Faithfull v. Globe Newspaper Co.
This text of 240 A.D. 1002 (Faithfull v. Globe Newspaper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denymg motion to vacate service of summons reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted with ten dollars costs. It does not sufficiently appear that the one upon whom the service was made, or Ms corporation, was a managing agent of the defendant, witMn section 229, subdivision 3, of the Civil Practice Act. (Lillibridge, Inc., v. Johnson Bronze Co., 220 App. Div. 573; affd., 247 N. Y. 548; Holzer v. Dodge Brothers, 233 id. 216; McKeon v. McGowan & Sons, 229 App. Div. 568; Fontana v. Post Printing & Publishing Co., 87 id. 233; Vitolo v. Bee Publishing Co., 66 id. 582.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faithfull-v-globe-newspaper-co-nyappdiv-1933.