Fait v. Bannon

97 A. 880, 127 Md. 698, 1916 Md. LEXIS 182
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedFebruary 29, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 97 A. 880 (Fait v. Bannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fait v. Bannon, 97 A. 880, 127 Md. 698, 1916 Md. LEXIS 182 (Md. 1916).

Opinion

Opinion by

Constable, J.

Affirmed.

The cause was argued before Boyd, C. J., Burke, Thomas, Urner, Stockbridge and Constable, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Board of Education
176 A. 878 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1935)
Gilpin v. Somerville
161 A. 272 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1932)
Rent-A-Car Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance
156 A. 847 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1931)
Boyd v. Busch
147 A. 718 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1929)
White v. Parks
140 A. 70 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A. 880, 127 Md. 698, 1916 Md. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fait-v-bannon-md-1916.