Faison v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Faison v. State

262 So. 3d 832

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 14, 2018

DocketNo. 1D18-3354

StatusPublished

This text of 262 So. 3d 832 (Faison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faison v. State, 262 So. 3d 832 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant's motion, filed on November 6, 2018, is treated as a response to the Court's order of October 26, 2018. Upon consideration of the response, the Court has determined that the order denying Appellant's motion to alter or amend judgment is not an appealable order. Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(4). To the extent that Appellant may be seeking review of the underlying Order of Dismissal, the appeal is untimely. Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(i) ; see Pennington v. Waldheim , 669 So.2d 1158, 1160 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

DISMISSED .

Wolf, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant's motion, filed on November 6, 2018, is treated as a response to the Court's order of October 26, 2018. Upon consideration of the response, the Court has determined that the order denying Appellant's motion to alter or amend judgment is not an appealable order. Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(4). To the extent that Appellant may be seeking review of the underlying Order of Dismissal, the appeal is untimely. Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(i) ; see Pennington v. Waldheim , 669 So.2d 1158, 1160 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

DISMISSED .

Wolf, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 So. 3d 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faison-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack