Faison v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.

Supreme Court

Faison v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.

537 U.S. 1102

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 13, 2003

DocketNo. 02-6955; No. 02-7182; No. 02-7291; No. 02-7517; No. 02-7635

StatusPublished

This text of 537 U.S. 1102 (Faison v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faison v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 537 U.S. 1102 (2003).

Pincite

Opinion

[1102]*1102C. A. 11th Cir.;

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist.;

C. A. 9th Cir.;

[1103]*1103No. 02-7517. No. 02-7635.

C. A. Fed. Cir.; and

C. A. 3d Cir. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until February 3, 2003, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI