Faison v. . Johnson

78 N.C. 78
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 N.C. 78 (Faison v. . Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Faison v. . Johnson, 78 N.C. 78 (N.C. 1878).

Opinion

Faircloth, J.

The Justice of the Peace adjudged that he had not jurisdiction of the action, from which the plaintiffs appealed to the Superior Court. In that Court the defendant alleged that his written answer filed in the lower Court had been lost or destroyed, and thereupon His Honor remanded the case to the Justice with permission to perfect the pleadings. This was error. His Honor had the power, *79 and it was his duty, under the liberal provisions of the ■Code, to perfect the pleadings and proceed with the trial. The case of Adams v. Reeves, 76 N. C. 412, has no application. The present is a case of supplying lost papers and mot of amending the record.

Error.

Pee, CuRiAM. . Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. . Garner
13 S.E. 768 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 N.C. 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faison-v-johnson-nc-1878.