Faison v. Deal

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 29, 2008
• Docket: 08-6030
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6030

MOSES FAISON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VICKIE W. DEAL; CHARLES R. PINNIX,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03062-D)

Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 29, 2008

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Moses Faison, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Moses Faison appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as barred by res

judicata. In his informal appellate brief, Faison failed to

address the district court’s basis for dismissing his case.

Therefore, Faison has waived appellate review of that issue. See

4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to the issues

raised in the informal brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -