Fairweather v. Stoltz

466 So. 2d 1278, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1002, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13478
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 17, 1985
DocketNo. 84-2223
StatusPublished

This text of 466 So. 2d 1278 (Fairweather v. Stoltz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fairweather v. Stoltz, 466 So. 2d 1278, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1002, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13478 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue in this case is whether there was a failure of consideration such as to require a rescission or cancellation of a deed. The facts are in dispute. There is competent substantial evidence in the record to support the trial court’s finding that there was no failure of consideration.

We affirm.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 So. 2d 1278, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1002, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairweather-v-stoltz-fladistctapp-1985.