Fairways Offshore Exploration, Inc. v. Patterson Services, Inc. and Cudd Pressure Control, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion issued May 23, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
settled their underlying dispute. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1).
Fairways and Cudd further state that they have agreed to bear their own attorney’s
fees and costs of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).
Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the portion of the appeal
relating to Fairways’ claims against Cudd and Cudd’s claims against Fairways,
with costs taxed against the party who incurred the same. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fairways Offshore Exploration, Inc. v. Patterson Services, Inc. and Cudd Pressure Control, Inc. (Fairways Offshore Exploration, Inc. v. Patterson Services, Inc. and Cudd Pressure Control, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.