Fairways Offshore Exploration, Inc. v. Patterson Services, Inc. and Cudd Pressure Control, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 23, 2013·No. 01-11-00079-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued May 23, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

settled their underlying dispute. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1).

Fairways and Cudd further state that they have agreed to bear their own attorney’s

fees and costs of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the portion of the appeal

relating to Fairways’ claims against Cudd and Cudd’s claims against Fairways,

with costs taxed against the party who incurred the same. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairways Offshore Exploration, Inc. v. Patterson Services, Inc. and Cudd Pressure Control, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Fairways Offshore Exploration, Inc. v. Patterson Services, Inc. and Cudd Pressure Control, Inc. (Fairways Offshore Exploration, Inc. v. Patterson Services, Inc. and Cudd Pressure Control, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.