Fairway Development Co. v. Bannock County

726 P.2d 765, 111 Idaho 653, 1986 Ida. LEXIS 517
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided September 16, 1986·No. No. 16347·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

HUNTLEY, Justice.

Fairway Development Company has filed this I.A.R. 12 certified appeal from the trial court’s order denying Fairway Development Company’s motion for partial summary judgment. After reviewing the briefs, and having heard oral argument, the Court is of the opinion that the appeal would not materially advance the processing of this litigation and, since the order is otherwise non-appealable, the Court concludes that the Rule 12 certification was improvidently granted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. See Pichon v. L.J. Broekemeier, Inc., 99 Idaho 598, 600, 586 P.2d 1042, 1044 (1978).

Costs to appellant.

DONALDSON, C.J., and SHEPARD, BAKES and BISTLINE JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairway Development Co. v. Bannock County, 726 P.2d 765, 111 Idaho 653, 1986 Ida. LEXIS 517 (Idaho 1986).

726 P.2d 765 (Fairway Development Co. v. Bannock County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of McCall v. Buxton
201 P.3d 629 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2009)
Fairway Development Co. v. Bannock County
804 P.2d 294 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1990)
FAIRWAY DEVELOPMENT v. Bannock County
750 P.2d 954 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1988)