Fairmount Funding Ltd. v. Stefansky

235 A.D.2d 213, 652 N.Y.S.2d 14, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 7, 1997·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered March 5, 1996, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion to vacate the default judgment entered against them for lack of jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[214] The motion was properly denied since the process server’s affidavits, which indicate that appellants were each served in accordance with CPLR 308 (4), constituted prima facie evidence of proper service, and appellants’ bald assertion that they never received process was insufficient to dispute the veracity or content of the affidavits (Manhattan Sav. Bank v Kohen, 231 AD2d 499). We have considered defendants-appellants’ remaining contention and find it to be meritless. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairmount Funding Ltd. v. Stefansky, 235 A.D.2d 213, 652 N.Y.S.2d 14, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

235 A.D.2d 213 (Fairmount Funding Ltd. v. Stefansky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lohr v. Fenton
2025 NY Slip Op 31905(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Slimani v. Citibank, N.A.
47 A.D.3d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Aames Capital Corp. v. Ford
294 A.D.2d 134 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Nazarian v. Monaco Imports, Ltd.
255 A.D.2d 265 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)