Fairmount Funding Ltd. v. Stefansky
This text of 235 A.D.2d 213 (Fairmount Funding Ltd. v. Stefansky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered March 5, 1996, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion to vacate the default judgment entered against them for lack of jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
[214]*214The motion was properly denied since the process server’s affidavits, which indicate that appellants were each served in accordance with CPLR 308 (4), constituted prima facie evidence of proper service, and appellants’ bald assertion that they never received process was insufficient to dispute the veracity or content of the affidavits (Manhattan Sav. Bank v Kohen, 231 AD2d 499). We have considered defendants-appellants’ remaining contention and find it to be meritless. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D.2d 213, 652 N.Y.S.2d 14, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairmount-funding-ltd-v-stefansky-nyappdiv-1997.