Fairmont Re-Bar Fab v. White

438 So. 2d 991, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22497
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1983·No. No. AR-74·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

That part of the order of the deputy commissioner imposing upon the employer/carrier penalties for the period of August 1, 1981 through October 31, 1982 is reversed and the cause remanded to the deputy commissioner to permit him to set forth with specificity the basis for an award of penalties for the time period indicated. [992] In all other respects, the order appealed is affirmed.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairmont Re-Bar Fab v. White, 438 So. 2d 991, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22497 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

438 So. 2d 991 (Fairmont Re-Bar Fab v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Power and Light Co. v. Mulkerrin
444 So. 2d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)