Fairmont Re-Bar Fab v. White

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fairmont Re-Bar Fab v. White

438 So. 2d 991, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22497

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 11, 1983

DocketNo. AR-74

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 438 So. 2d 991 (Fairmont Re-Bar Fab v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fairmont Re-Bar Fab v. White, 438 So. 2d 991, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22497 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

That part of the order of the deputy commissioner imposing upon the employer/carrier penalties for the period of August 1, 1981 through October 31, 1982 is reversed and the cause remanded to the deputy commissioner to permit him to set forth with specificity the basis for an award of penalties for the time period indicated. [992]*992In all other respects, the order appealed is affirmed.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

That part of the order of the deputy commissioner imposing upon the employer/carrier penalties for the period of August 1, 1981 through October 31, 1982 is reversed and the cause remanded to the deputy commissioner to permit him to set forth with specificity the basis for an award of penalties for the time period indicated. [992]*992In all other respects, the order appealed is affirmed.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

438 So. 2d 991, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairmont-re-bar-fab-v-white-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack