Fairlie v. Maxwell
1 Wend. 17
This text of 1 Wend. 17 (Fairlie v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fairlie v. Maxwell, 1 Wend. 17 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).
Opinion
By the Court,
This case is not distinguishable from that of The People v. Van Wyck, (4 Cowen, 260.) The district attorney does not receive the fees claimed from him: there is, therefore, no propriety in subjecting him to the payment of them. The clerk has a claim against the county where such cause is tried, for his remuneration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kipp v. Burton
63 L.R.A. 325 (Montana Supreme Court, 1903)
Cleveland & Cameron v. Tittle
22 S.W. 8 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1893)
Jett v. Shinn
47 Ark. 373 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1886)
Ambler v. Leach
15 W. Va. 677 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1879)
Jump v. McClurg
35 Mo. 193 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1864)
Parsons v. Swett
32 N.H. 87 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1855)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Wend. 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairlie-v-maxwell-nysupct-1828.