Fairley v. Patterson

282 F. Supp. 164, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7559
District Court, S.D. Mississippi·Decided October 4, 1967·No. Civ. A. 2205H·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ORDER

DAN M. RUSSELL, Jr., District Judge.

This cause came on for hearing on the complaint, the answer and argument of counsel, it being stipulated in open court that this hearing would be considered as a final hearing on the merits, and all parties having announced that no factual issues are involved and no testimony or evidence was to be offered, the sole question for determination being whether or not Section 2870 of the Mississippi Code of 1942, as amended by the legislature at the regular session of 1966, comes within the purview of or is covered by *165 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, being now Section 1973c of Title 42, U.S.C.

It is the opinion of the Court that said Section 2870, as amended by the legislature of Mississippi at its regular session of 1966, does not come within the purview of and is not covered by Title 42, Section 1973c U.S.C., and that plaintiffs are entitled to no relief in this action.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the injunction prayed for in this action be, and the same is, hereby, denied and the Complaint is dismissed at the cost of plaintiffs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairley v. Patterson, 282 F. Supp. 164, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7559 (S.D. Miss. 1967).

282 F. Supp. 164 (Fairley v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fairley v. Patterson
493 F.2d 598 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Allen v. State Board of Elections
393 U.S. 544 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Hadnott v. Amos
295 F. Supp. 1003 (M.D. Alabama, 1968)
Fairley v. Patterson
392 U.S. 902 (Supreme Court, 1968)