Fairleigh v. Bugbee
130 A. 923, 3 N.J. Misc. 1072, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 96
Opinion
After a full examination of this case we have reached the conclusion that the judgment of the Prerogative Court should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Vice Chancellor-Buchanan, and reported in 2 N. J. Adv. R. 843.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fairleigh v. Bugbee, 130 A. 923, 3 N.J. Misc. 1072, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 96 (N.J. 1925).
130 A. 923 (Fairleigh v. Bugbee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estate of Hammerle v. Director, Division of Taxation
22 N.J. Tax 342 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2005)
Calvert v. Wallrath
457 S.W.2d 376 (Texas Supreme Court, 1970)
In Re Estate of Lichtenstein
247 A.2d 320 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1968)
Ten Eyck v. Walsh
52 A.2d 445 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1947)
In Re Gemmell
197 A. 428 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1938)
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. McCutcheon
123 N.J. Eq. 315 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1938)
In Re Hollander
195 A. 805 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1938)
Blodgett v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.
149 A. 790 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1930)