Fairgrieve v. Inc. Village of Mineola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fairgrieve v. Inc. Village of Mineola

238 A.D.2d 466, 656 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4035

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 21, 1997·Published

Opinion

—In an action for a judgment declaring Resolution No. R-95-119 of the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Mineóla to be illegal and void and to enjoin the defendants from hiring a Village Administrator, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mc-Cabe, J.), dated April 2, 1996, which denied his motion for an order enjoining the defendants from hiring a Village Administrator, granted the defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint, and declared the resolution to be valid and legal.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the resolution adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Mineóla (hereinafter the Board) creating the position of Village Administrator, a position with specifically enumerated responsibilities subject to the control and direction of the Mayor and the Board, was authorized by Village Law § 4-412 (1). O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for a judgment declaring Resolution No. R-95-119 of the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Mineóla to be illegal and void and to enjoin the defendants from hiring a Village Administrator, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mc-Cabe, J.), dated April 2, 1996, which denied his motion for an order enjoining the defendants from hiring a Village Administrator, granted the defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint, and declared the resolution to be valid and legal.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the resolution adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Mineóla (hereinafter the Board) creating the position of Village Administrator, a position with specifically enumerated responsibilities subject to the control and direction of the Mayor and the Board, was authorized by Village Law § 4-412 (1). O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Fairgrieve v. Inc. Village of Mineola, 238 A.D.2d 466, 656 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4035 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

238 A.D.2d 466 (Fairgrieve v. Inc. Village of Mineola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related