Fairfield Place Homeowners Ass'n v. Pipkin

161 So. 3d 1211
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedSeptember 12, 2014
Docket1130985
StatusPublished

This text of 161 So. 3d 1211 (Fairfield Place Homeowners Ass'n v. Pipkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fairfield Place Homeowners Ass'n v. Pipkin, 161 So. 3d 1211 (Ala. 2014).

Opinion

MOORE, Chief Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

[1212]*1212STUART, PARKER, and WISE, JJ., concur. SHAW, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horsley v. Horsley
280 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 So. 3d 1211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairfield-place-homeowners-assn-v-pipkin-ala-2014.