Fairfield Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Nally

1 N.E.3d 433, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1469
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 16, 2014·No. 2013-1085·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 11AP-508, 2013-Ohio-2106. Reported at 136 Ohio St.3d 1556, 2013-Ohio-4861, 996 N.E.2d 985. It is ordered by the court that the motion for reconsideration of the decision not to accept Proposition of Law Nos. II and III for review in this case is granted, and the appeal is now accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and III.

It is further ordered that an amended appellant’s brief is due within 20 days of the date of this entry, and briefing shall otherwise proceed pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.03 through 16.04.

O’Connor, C.J., and Kennedy and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairfield Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Nally, 1 N.E.3d 433, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1469 (Ohio 2014).

1 N.E.3d 433 (Fairfield Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Nally) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fairfield County Board of Commissioners v. Nally
34 N.E.3d 873 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2015)