Fairey v. Hildebrand

157 S.E. 841, 159 S.C. 515, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 239
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 23, 1931
Docket13097
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 157 S.E. 841 (Fairey v. Hildebrand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fairey v. Hildebrand, 157 S.E. 841, 159 S.C. 515, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 239 (S.C. 1931).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Brease.

*520 It is well established that in a law case this Court will not disturb findings of fact of the probate Court, concurred in by the Circuit Court, when there is any evidence to support such findings. It is needless to cite any of the many authorities sustaining this proposition. There was evidence in this case to warrant the findings of fact of the Probate Judge, which were approved, on appeal by the Circuit Judge.

We find no error of law in the holdings of the Circuit Judge. The decree, which will be reported, is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Cothran, Stabler, Carter and Bonham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HIERS BY HIERS v. Mullens
425 S.E.2d 57 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1992)
Claim of Limehouse v. Stall
16 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)
In Re. Limehouse Estate
16 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 S.E. 841, 159 S.C. 515, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairey-v-hildebrand-sc-1931.