Fairey v. Hildebrand

157 S.E. 841, 159 S.C. 515, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 239
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 23, 1931·No. 13097·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Brease.

*520 It is well established that in a law case this Court will not disturb findings of fact of the probate Court, concurred in by the Circuit Court, when there is any evidence to support such findings. It is needless to cite any of the many authorities sustaining this proposition. There was evidence in this case to warrant the findings of fact of the Probate Judge, which were approved, on appeal by the Circuit Judge.

We find no error of law in the holdings of the Circuit Judge. The decree, which will be reported, is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Cothran, Stabler, Carter and Bonham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairey v. Hildebrand, 157 S.E. 841, 159 S.C. 515, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 239 (S.C. 1931).

157 S.E. 841 (Fairey v. Hildebrand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

HIERS BY HIERS v. Mullens
425 S.E.2d 57 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1992)
Claim of Limehouse v. Stall
16 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)
In Re. Limehouse Estate
16 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)