Faires v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
91 S.E. 241, 19 Ga. App. 121, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 8
Opinion
The four excerpts from the charge of the court, assigned by plaintiff in error as hurtful to him because not warranted by the facts in the record, are not subject to the criticism made, and the verdict is not without evidence to support it. The controlling issues in the case were fairly submitted to the jury by the trial judge, and slight inaccuracies in statement should not disturb the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Faires v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 91 S.E. 241, 19 Ga. App. 121, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 8 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
91 S.E. 241 (Faires v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'QUINN v. James
192 S.E.2d 507 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Porter v. Bennett
127 S.E.2d 875 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Kimball v. State
10 S.E.2d 240 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)