Fairclough v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fairclough v. State

680 So. 2d 633, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10927, 1996 WL 590780

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 16, 1996

DocketNo. 95-3416

StatusPublished

This text of 680 So. 2d 633 (Fairclough v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fairclough v. State, 680 So. 2d 633, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10927, 1996 WL 590780 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm as to all issues except the issue of appellant’s conviction and sentence for armed home invasion robbery, which was contrary to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of judgment and sentence. See Tannihill v. State, 559 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). We therefore reverse appellant’s conviction and vacate his sentence as to count I, armed home invasion robbery. However, remand for resentencing is unnecessary as appellant’s sentencing guidelines scoresheet reflects that the armed home invasion robbery count was not scored in calculating his sentence as to the other counts. See Duncan v. State, 503 So.2d 443 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

WARNER, PARIENTE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm as to all issues except the issue of appellant’s conviction and sentence for armed home invasion robbery, which was contrary to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of judgment and sentence. See Tannihill v. State, 559 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). We therefore reverse appellant’s conviction and vacate his sentence as to count I, armed home invasion robbery. However, remand for resentencing is unnecessary as appellant’s sentencing guidelines scoresheet reflects that the armed home invasion robbery count was not scored in calculating his sentence as to the other counts. See Duncan v. State, 503 So.2d 443 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

WARNER, PARIENTE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

680 So. 2d 633, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10927, 1996 WL 590780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairclough-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack