Fairclough v. . Southern Pacific Company
114 N.E. 1066, 219 N.Y. 657, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1005
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs,' on the authority of Robinson v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. (112 N. Y. 315.)
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscook, Collin and Hogan, JJ.; Chase and Cardozo, JJ., dissent on the ground that the amended Code section is retroactive.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fairclough v. . Southern Pacific Company, 114 N.E. 1066, 219 N.Y. 657, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1005 (N.Y. 1916).
114 N.E. 1066 (Fairclough v. . Southern Pacific Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad
586 F. Supp. 252 (N.D. Illinois, 1984)
Neubourg v. M. Milton Glass
41 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)
Benjamin v. State Liquor Authority
17 A.D.2d 71 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Ellis v. Lynch
106 F. Supp. 100 (D. New Jersey, 1952)
Gatti Paper Stock Corp. v. Erie Railroad
247 A.D. 45 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Vandeweghe v. City of New York
150 Misc. 815 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)
Jacobsen v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
128 Misc. 138 (New York Supreme Court, 1926)