Fairclough v. Hugo
This text of 207 A.D.2d 707 (Fairclough v. Hugo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered on or about March 31, 1993, granting summary judgment to [708]*708the medical defendants dismissing all causes of action in the amended complaint arising from spoliation of evidence, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Under the facts of this case, we agree with the IAS Court that the plaintiffs have failed to establish that the alleged failure to preserve evidence would make it extremely difficult or impossible for the plaintiffs to establish their claim for malpractice (see, Pharr v Cortese, 147 Misc 2d 1078). Concur— Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 A.D.2d 707, 616 N.Y.S.2d 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairclough-v-hugo-nyappdiv-1994.