Fairchild v. State of Utah

District Court, D. Utah·Decided October 15, 2019·No. 2:17-cv-01317·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

STEVEN MICHAEL FAIRCHILD, . MEMORANDUM DECISION & Petitioner, ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

SHANE NELSON, Case No. 2:17-CV-1317 DN Respondent. District Judge David Nuffer

Based on the Tenth Circuit’s limited remand, the Court considers whether to issue a certificate of appealability (COA) here. See R.11, Rs. Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts (“The district court must issue or deny a [COA] when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant.”). When a habeas petition is denied on procedural grounds, as this one was, a petitioner is entitled to a COA only if he shows that “jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (citing 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253 (2018)). Petitioner has not made this showing. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a COA is DENIED. DATED this 15" day of October, 2019. BY THE COURT:

United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairchild v. State of Utah, (D. Utah 2019).

Fairchild v. State of Utah (Fairchild v. State of Utah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slack v. McDaniel
529 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 2000)