Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Fairchild v. State

Fairchild v. State

669 So. 2d 279, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 631, 1996 WL 39594
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 1996·No. No. 95-2326·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hoffman v. State, 397 So.2d 288, 290 (Fla.1981) (“A defendant is entitled to a fair trial, not a perfect trial.” (quoting Lackos v. State, 339 So.2d 217, 219 (Fla.1976))).

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairchild v. State, 669 So. 2d 279, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 631, 1996 WL 39594 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

669 So. 2d 279 (Fairchild v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoffman v. State
397 So. 2d 288 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Lackos v. State
339 So. 2d 217 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)