Fairchild v. State

53 S.W.3d 47, 346 Ark. 6, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 447, 2001 WL 1043253
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fairchild v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 349 Ark. 147
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided September 6, 2001·No. CR 01-856·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Cymber L. Tadlock, as a state-salaried, full-time public defender, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant Robert Lee Fairchild, an indigent defendant, in this criminal case. Fairchild was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. Ms. Tad-lock timely filed a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and lodged the appellate record with the Supreme Court Clerk.

Ms. Tadlock now asks this court to relieve her as appellant’s counsel and to appoint new counsel. Ms. Tadlock cites Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000), that public defenders cannot be paid separately to file appeals.1 Accordingly, we grant Ms. Tadlock’s motion to be relieved for good cause shown. Mr. John W. Cone will be substituted as appellant’s attorney in this matter.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairchild v. State, 53 S.W.3d 47, 346 Ark. 6, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 447, 2001 WL 1043253 (Ark. 2001).

53 S.W.3d 47 (Fairchild v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rushing v. State
8 S.W.3d 489 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)