Fairchild v. State
This text of 53 S.W.3d 47 (Fairchild v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cymber L. Tadlock, as a state-salaried, full-time public defender, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant Robert Lee Fairchild, an indigent defendant, in this criminal case. Fairchild was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. Ms. Tad-lock timely filed a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and lodged the appellate record with the Supreme Court Clerk.
Ms. Tadlock now asks this court to relieve her as appellant’s counsel and to appoint new counsel. Ms. Tadlock cites Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000), that public defenders cannot be paid separately to file appeals.1 Accordingly, we grant Ms. Tadlock’s motion to be relieved for good cause shown. Mr. John W. Cone will be substituted as appellant’s attorney in this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 S.W.3d 47, 346 Ark. 6, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 447, 2001 WL 1043253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairchild-v-state-ark-2001.