Fairchild v. Snyder

43 Iowa 23
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedApril 6, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 43 Iowa 23 (Fairchild v. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fairchild v. Snyder, 43 Iowa 23 (iowa 1876).

Opinion

Adams, J.

"We cannot say that a juror may not, while sitting in the trial of a case by day, allow himself to be stupefied with liquor by night without impairing his powers of apprehension, his memory or good judgment; yet we do not illicit it would be safe to establish a rule that such conduct would not vitiate a verdict. Much must be left to the discretion of the judge presiding at the trial.

"Without expressing any opinion, therefore, as to whether the motion should have been granted, we think it is not one of those cases which call for our interference.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carlisle v. City of Council Bluffs
130 N.W. 813 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1911)
United States v. Spencer
8 N.M. 667 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1896)
Hopkins v. Knapp & Spalding Co.
60 N.W. 620 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Iowa 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairchild-v-snyder-iowa-1876.