Fairchild v. Snyder

43 Iowa 23
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided April 6, 1876·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Adams, J.

"We cannot say that a juror may not, while sitting in the trial of a case by day, allow himself to be stupefied with liquor by night without impairing his powers of apprehension, his memory or good judgment; yet we do not illicit it would be safe to establish a rule that such conduct would not vitiate a verdict. Much must be left to the discretion of the judge presiding at the trial.

"Without expressing any opinion, therefore, as to whether the motion should have been granted, we think it is not one of those cases which call for our interference.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairchild v. Snyder, 43 Iowa 23 (iowa 1876).

43 Iowa 23 (Fairchild v. Snyder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carlisle v. City of Council Bluffs
130 N.W. 813 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1911)
United States v. Spencer
8 N.M. 667 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1896)
Hopkins v. Knapp & Spalding Co.
60 N.W. 620 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1894)