Fairchild v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

219 N.W. 839, 117 Neb. 97, 1928 Neb. LEXIS 16
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided May 28, 1928·No. No. 25512·Published

Opinion

Dean, J.

This is an independent suit in equity by Herman E. Fair-child for a new trial of the case of Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company against Arthur A. Nichols and others, impleaded with Herman E. Fairchild, wherein the district court for Jefferson county entered a judgment against Fairchild and others for $8,502.94. This suit was commenced at a subsequent term of court, and upon a trial of the issues raised by the pleadings herein the judgment in the former case was set aside as to Fairchild and as to [98]*98him a new trial was granted. From that judgment the Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company appealed.

On direct appeal from the judgment against Fairchild for $8,502.94, it was held that he was not liable therefor. That judgment was reversed, with directions to dismiss the action as to him. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Nichols, ante, p. 93. By direct appeal in that case Fair-child therefore obtained all the relief to which he was entitled. The present suit in equity for a new trial was therefore unnecessary, and for that reason the judgment granting a new trial in the equity suit is reversed and dismissed at the cost of Fairchild in both courts.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairchild v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance, 219 N.W. 839, 117 Neb. 97, 1928 Neb. LEXIS 16 (Neb. 1928).

219 N.W. 839 (Fairchild v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.