Fairchild v. Hatfield

595 P.2d 1093, 100 Idaho 198, 1979 Ida. LEXIS 421
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided June 5, 1979·No. No. 12803·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appellant Hatfield brings this appeal from a district court judgment which awarded plaintiff respondent Fair-child $2,820 in damages plus costs and $750 in attorney fees on a claim arising from an arrangement the parties entered into with respect to a used 1950 model D-8 Caterpillar bulldozer. We have reviewed the record in the above cause and find no prejudicial error. I.R.C.P. 52(a); Obray v. Mitchell, 98 Idaho 533, 567 P.2d 1284 (1977). Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs to respondent.

BAKES, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairchild v. Hatfield, 595 P.2d 1093, 100 Idaho 198, 1979 Ida. LEXIS 421 (Idaho 1979).

595 P.2d 1093 (Fairchild v. Hatfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Obray v. Mitchell
567 P.2d 1284 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1977)