Fairchild v. Hatfield

595 P.2d 1093, 100 Idaho 198, 1979 Ida. LEXIS 421
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedJune 5, 1979
DocketNo. 12803
StatusPublished

This text of 595 P.2d 1093 (Fairchild v. Hatfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fairchild v. Hatfield, 595 P.2d 1093, 100 Idaho 198, 1979 Ida. LEXIS 421 (Idaho 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appellant Hatfield brings this appeal from a district court judgment which awarded plaintiff respondent Fair-child $2,820 in damages plus costs and $750 in attorney fees on a claim arising from an arrangement the parties entered into with respect to a used 1950 model D-8 Caterpillar bulldozer. We have reviewed the record in the above cause and find no prejudicial error. I.R.C.P. 52(a); Obray v. Mitchell, 98 Idaho 533, 567 P.2d 1284 (1977). Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs to respondent.

BAKES, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Obray v. Mitchell
567 P.2d 1284 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
595 P.2d 1093, 100 Idaho 198, 1979 Ida. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairchild-v-hatfield-idaho-1979.