Fairchild v. Fairchild

624 So. 2d 817, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9627, 1993 WL 382581
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 29, 1993
DocketNo. 92-2615
StatusPublished

This text of 624 So. 2d 817 (Fairchild v. Fairchild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fairchild v. Fairchild, 624 So. 2d 817, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9627, 1993 WL 382581 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm all issues except the order holding appellant in contempt, which must be reversed because the trial court did not make a finding that he had the ability to pay the purge amount. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985); Knowles v. Knowles, 522 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Reversed.

GUNTHER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knowles v. Knowles
522 So. 2d 477 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Bowen v. Bowen
471 So. 2d 1274 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
624 So. 2d 817, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9627, 1993 WL 382581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairchild-v-fairchild-fladistctapp-1993.