Fairchild v. Fairchild

624 So. 2d 817, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9627, 1993 WL 382581
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 1993·No. No. 92-2615·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm all issues except the order holding appellant in contempt, which must be reversed because the trial court did not make a finding that he had the ability to pay the purge amount. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985); Knowles v. Knowles, 522 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Reversed.

GUNTHER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairchild v. Fairchild, 624 So. 2d 817, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9627, 1993 WL 382581 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

624 So. 2d 817 (Fairchild v. Fairchild) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knowles v. Knowles
522 So. 2d 477 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Bowen v. Bowen
471 So. 2d 1274 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)