Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal

989 A.2d 602, 295 Conn. 908, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 80
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 25, 2010·No. SC 18560·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 163 (AC 29854), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly interpret General Statutes § 21-80a (b) (1) as permitting a property owner to avoid the presumption of retaliatory eviction when its summary process action is based on resident conduct that is in violation of a material provision of the rental agreement?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal, 989 A.2d 602, 295 Conn. 908, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 80 (Colo. 2010).

989 A.2d 602 (Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal
45 A.3d 627 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)