Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal
Opinion
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 163 (AC 29854), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly interpret General Statutes § 21-80a (b) (1) as permitting a property owner to avoid the presumption of retaliatory eviction when its summary process action is based on resident conduct that is in violation of a material provision of the rental agreement?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
989 A.2d 602 (Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.