Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal
This text of 989 A.2d 602 (Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 163 (AC 29854), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly interpret General Statutes § 21-80a (b) (1) as permitting a property owner to avoid the presumption of retaliatory eviction when its summary process action is based on resident conduct that is in violation of a material provision of the rental agreement?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
989 A.2d 602, 295 Conn. 908, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairchild-heights-inc-v-dickal-conn-2010.