Fairbanks v. Robinson
This text of 30 P. 812 (Fairbanks v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage executed by the intestate Martin to secure a portion of the purchase money of the premises. The answer of the defendants Olive and John Martin, avers that all the property of the intestate, including the mortgaged premises, was set apart to said defendants under section 1469 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The answer was demurred to, and the demurrer overruled.
We are of opinion that the demurrer should have been sustained. The matters set up in the answer constitute no defense to this action.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded with instruction to sustain the demurrer to defendants’ answer, with leave to amend within ten days after notice thereof.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 P. 812, 64 Cal. 250, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairbanks-v-robinson-cal-1883.