Fairbanks v. Amorskeag Nat. Bank

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire

Fairbanks v. Amorskeag Nat. Bank

38 F. 630, 1889 U.S. App. LEXIS 2187

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire

DecidedApril 24, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 38 F. 630 (Fairbanks v. Amorskeag Nat. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fairbanks v. Amorskeag Nat. Bank, 38 F. 630, 1889 U.S. App. LEXIS 2187 (circtdnh 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Colt, J.

This case comes up upon appeal from the district court. The record is the same as was before that court. From a careful examination of the record and the briefs of counsel, I am entirely satisfied with. the correctness of the conclusions reached by the district judge. Whether intended or not, the evidence shows beyond question the fraudulent character of the compromise effected by these defendants. It is also equally clear that this cause is not barred by the statute of limitations. Agreeing, as I do, with the reasoning and conclusions of the district court, it becomes unnecessary for me to do more than direct that the decree of the district court be affirmed, and the appeal dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colt, J.

This case comes up upon appeal from the district court. The record is the same as was before that court. From a careful examination of the record and the briefs of counsel, I am entirely satisfied with. the correctness of the conclusions reached by the district judge. Whether intended or not, the evidence shows beyond question the fraudulent character of the compromise effected by these defendants. It is also equally clear that this cause is not barred by the statute of limitations. Agreeing, as I do, with the reasoning and conclusions of the district court, it becomes unnecessary for me to do more than direct that the decree of the district court be affirmed, and the appeal dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 F. 630, 1889 U.S. App. LEXIS 2187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairbanks-v-amorskeag-nat-bank-circtdnh-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack