Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Baton Rouge Rice Mill, Inc.

278 U.S. 564, 49 S. Ct. 35, 73 L. Ed. 508, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 344
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 29, 1928
DocketNo. 45
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 278 U.S. 564 (Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Baton Rouge Rice Mill, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Baton Rouge Rice Mill, Inc., 278 U.S. 564, 49 S. Ct. 35, 73 L. Ed. 508, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 344 (1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The writ of error is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question on. the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr; 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.

Messrs. C. V. Parker and Joéeph A. Lovet for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allied Fidelity Insurance Co. v. Environmental Quality Council
753 P.2d 1038 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1988)
Long v. Carolina Baking Co.
8 S.E.2d 326 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1939)
Grimsley v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
1 S.E.2d 157 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1939)
Temple v. Atlantic Coast Line R.R. Co.
163 S.E. 644 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Powe v. A.C.L.R. R. Co.
159 S.E. 473 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 U.S. 564, 49 S. Ct. 35, 73 L. Ed. 508, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairbanks-morse-co-v-baton-rouge-rice-mill-inc-scotus-1928.