Fairbanks, Et Ux. v. Robertson

Supreme Court of Florida

Fairbanks, Et Ux. v. Robertson

9 So. 2d 369, 151 Fla. 224, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1140

DecidedJuly 24, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 9 So. 2d 369 (Fairbanks, Et Ux. v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fairbanks, Et Ux. v. Robertson, 9 So. 2d 369, 151 Fla. 224, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1140 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The record and the briefs in this case have been examined. It involves a controversy as to priority between State and County tax certificate and Municipal tax certificate holders. A full statement of the case and discussion of the questions raised would require a long opinion that would serve no useful purpose. We find no reason to reverse the chancellor so the decree appealed from is affirmed. ■

*225 Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The record and the briefs in this case have been examined. It involves a controversy as to priority between State and County tax certificate and Municipal tax certificate holders. A full statement of the case and discussion of the questions raised would require a long opinion that would serve no useful purpose. We find no reason to reverse the chancellor so the decree appealed from is affirmed. ■

*225 Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 So. 2d 369, 151 Fla. 224, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fairbanks-et-ux-v-robertson-fla-1942.