Fairbanks, Et Ux. v. Robertson

9 So. 2d 369, 151 Fla. 224, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1140
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 24, 1942·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The record and the briefs in this case have been examined. It involves a controversy as to priority between State and County tax certificate and Municipal tax certificate holders. A full statement of the case and discussion of the questions raised would require a long opinion that would serve no useful purpose. We find no reason to reverse the chancellor so the decree appealed from is affirmed. ■

*225 Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairbanks, Et Ux. v. Robertson, 9 So. 2d 369, 151 Fla. 224, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1140 (Fla. 1942).

9 So. 2d 369 (Fairbanks, Et Ux. v. Robertson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.